Get the recommendation, business case, and clear next step before your team commits budget, time, or teams to a build, vendor, automation, or internal path.
Best when a workflow is too valuable to keep debating and too specific for a generic tool.
Find the decision worth proving before serious budget, time, or teams get committed.
UltB case study
Actual recovered kickoff value
$180K/year
“Team Titan helped us get clear on the bottleneck fast and turn it into a kickoff system we can keep improving.”
Igor Shapiro, Founder, UltB
See how UltB did itThe Report helps your team decide whether to build, buy, automate, consolidate, use a vendor, or keep the work internal before serious budget, time, or teams get committed.
Start with the repeated work that is costing time, revenue, service quality, or executive attention.
Bring together the evidence, constraints, business case, and recommended path so the next move is grounded.
Leave with a clear recommendation for the workflow: build, buy, automate, vendor, internal execution, or no action.
When owned software is the right answer, Team Titan carries the path into a product your business can run, manage, and improve.
Each Report becomes the operating record for the workflow decision, the chosen path, and what changed once execution began.
The Report is the decision layer. When the evidence points to owned software, Team Titan can turn that path into a working product with ownership, status, and decision history in one place.
Pricing and exception workspace
Scattered requests, unclear ownership, and manual follow-up become one usable workflow surface.
Before
Requests scattered across inboxes and spreadsheets
No clear owner, status view, or decision history
Customers wait while updates move manually
First version
Prioritized queue for pending requests
Context for each decision
Approval, rejection, and follow-up path
Decision history your team can improve
Benchmark context
Use the Report to compare the cost of delay, false starts, and delivery paths before choosing the next workflow move.
Time to launch
From kickoff to a usable MVP
Traditional build path
12 months
With Team Titan
12 days
Cost to launch
Estimated cost to get the same workflow live
Traditional build path
$1,813,998
With Team Titan
$50,000
Delivery hours
Team time required to get the same workflow live
Traditional build path
9,546 hrs
With Team Titan
1,005 hrs
The benchmark model reflects a traditional workflow build across strategy, product, design, engineering, QA, integration, analytics, security, GTM, and program support. Strategy advisory or vendor-selection work can add cost before implementation begins.
Team Titan pricing depends on the Report scope and the next path selected. The delivery comparison is directional context for workflows where owned software becomes the right answer.
In 15-30 minutes, the goal is to understand one workflow decision and decide whether a Team Titan Report is worth the next step.
Identify the workflow
Pick the process that is slow, fragmented, still manual, or still poorly supported by the way the team works today.
Check the fit
Review the systems involved, the operational bottleneck, and whether the decision has enough business consequence.
Decide the next step
Leave knowing whether the workflow deserves a sourced Report, a later follow-up, or no action for now.